GUILD WARS 1 CODE THAN WARFRAME

I'm trying to remember if AO had a persistent world though and I can't remember since it was so long ago. Obviously the relays and towns are persistent, although there are never permanent significant changes that happen inside of them (that I'm aware of). But not sure if that counts as a persistent world. I'm starting to think the reason why it's not called an MMO is because it is an action game and also maybe because it didn't start out as an MMO.I'll throw in a side question: Does Warframe have any 'persistent worlds'? The landscapes are sort of persistent in that, because they are broken into instances, there is always one running somewhere.

Guild Wars 1 Code Than Warframe

Total failure, especially the first time, but it was a game where you were in the same map as a LOT of other players and could fight alongside hundreds of players during Arkfall events or whatever they were called: essentially giant world bosses designed for everyone to come together to beat them. But there is at least still no 'persistent fiction' in a game like CoD like there is in Guild Wars, Warframe, AO, etc.* This number has never been (and can't really be) defined, but the instinct seems to be something that is 'an order of magnitude' like 100 or 1000.I'm pretty sure it has a better netcode than Warframe.I'm pretty sure a LOT of games have better netcode than warframe.To me, an MMO is something like -try not to laugh at me for saying this, but - Defiance/Defiance 2050. Although these days even that is somewhat blurry with the persistent weapon upgrades systems in these games. And the more open stance which says that having massive amounts of players with persistent data in the same server, data which applies to the same core gameplay loop and persistent universe.So even in the second definition, Call of Duty is not an MMO because those massive numbers of players are not sharing a persistent experience in the same persistent world. The literal stance which says that you must have a massive* number of players partaking in some core gameplay loop together in the same persistent environment simultaneously. But actually they use different instances for that, so the persistence is an illusion.Yeah there seem to be two stances on what constitutes 'Massively'.

I suppose a (slightly) better example I've played might be Black Desert, but I neevr really got all that far into it.Whereas any game where it's just 4 people is just multiplayer: you could say it's a VERY popular multiplayer game if there's a lot of people playing it worldwide, but it's not an MMO, because they're all in separate instances of the same game.warframe isn't an MMO, it's a TPS/RPG/ looter shooter hybrid, with other weird bits of other game's DNA mixed in.

Guild Wars 1 Free